Skip to main content

Table 3 Individual level Pearson correlation coefficient matrices for FOCUS 1.0 and FOCUS 2.0

From: An updated analysis of safety climate and downstream outcomes in two convenience samples of U.S. fire departments (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 survey waves)

 

1. Age

2. Years of experience

3. Engagement—EMS

4. Engagement—fire

5. Job Satisfaction

6. Safety Behavior

7. Safety Compliance

8. Management Commitment

9. Supervisor Support

FOCUS 1.0 (n = 19,645 individuals)

1. Age

1.00

        

2. Years of experience

0.80

1.00

       

3. Engagement on an EMS runs

− 0.07

− 0.06

1.00

      

4. Engagement on a fire runs

− 0.06

− 0.10

0.41

1.00

     

5. Job Satisfaction

0.04

− 0.03

0.28

0.46

1.00

    

6. Safety Behavior

− 0.08

0.01

0.44

0.02

0.03

1.00

   

7. Safety Compliance

− 0.05

0.02

0.39

− 0.10

− 0.19

0.73

1.00

  

8. Management Commitment

− 0.09

− 0.03

0.50

0.32

0.41

0.68

0.36

1.00

 

9. Supervisor Support

− 0.04

− 0.08

0.33

0.56

0.43

0.21

0.13

0.31

1.00

FOCUS 2.0 (n = 15,112 individuals)

1. Age

1.00

        

2. Years of experience

0.74

1.00

       

3. Engagement on an EMS runs

− 0.16

− 0.22

1.00

      

4. Engagement on a fire runs

− 0.04

− 0.06

0.41

1.00

     

5. Job Satisfaction

− 0.03

− 0.08

0.47

0.51

1.00

    

6. Safety Behavior

0.08

− 0.06

− 0.14

0.22

0.37

1.00

   

7. Safety Compliance

0.06

− 0.01

− 0.08

0.35

0.22

0.69

1.00

  

8. Management Commitment

0.05

− 0.07

0.20

0.38

0.68

0.61

0.18

1.00

 

9. Supervisor Support

0.05

− 0.08

0.29

0.39

0.67

0.55

0.43

0.72

1.00

  1. Bolded values indicate moderate (0.50–0.69) and high (0.70–0.99) correlations