Skip to main content

Table 6 Demographic comparisons related to firearm safety training among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

From: A national study of firearm exposure and safety training among rural youth

Variables

Cross tab analysis

Logistic regression analysisa

Yes

No

p value

OR

CI

n (Row %)b

n (Row %)b

Completed firearm safety course

 Sex

  Male

1154 (72)

455 (28)

< 0.001

1.61

1.35–1.92

  Female

777 (48)

848 (52)

 

1.0 (ref)

 

 Age

  16–18 years

1313 (60)

861 (40)

0.168

1.28

1.06–1.53

  13–15 years

628 (58)

457 (42)

 

1.0 (ref)

 

 Residence

  Farm

1001 (67)

483 (33)

< 0.001

1.64

1.29–2.08

  Country/not farm

651 (59)

455 (41)

 

1.28

1.00–1.63

  Town

292 (44)

379 (56)

 

1.0 (ref)

 

 Race/ethnicity

  Non-Hispanic White

1821 (61)

1185 (39)

< 0.001

1.10

0.78–1.56

  Other races/ethnicities

119 (47)

134 (53)

 

1.0 (ref)

 

 U.S. census region

  Midwest

1265 (59)

884 (41)

0.025

0.78

0.48–1.28

  South

418 (60)

274 (40)

 

0.84

0.50–1.41

  West

196 (67)

96 (33)

 

1.15

0.66–2.03

  Northeast

58 (53)

51 (47)

 

1.0 ref)

 

 School/club shooting team member

  Yes

630 (87)

95 (13)

< 0.001

4.20

3.25–5.43

  No

1279 (52)

1199 (48)

 

1.0 (ref)

 

 Firearm usage

  Never Used a Firearm

35 (8)

401 (92)

< 0.001

0.14

0.09–0.21

  Both rifle and handgun

1583 (72)

604 (28)

 

1.80

1.43–2.25

  Rifle or handgun only

309 (50)

305 (50)

 

1.0 (ref)

 
  1. aThe analysis performed controlled for all other listed variables in the model
  2. bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values